People are nature's children, yet we create cities, highly
unnatural assemblies of brick, concrete and steel - I had read this statement
some time back but I do not recollect which urbanologist said this. A great
majority of the people who live in the city are fettered with pressure of work.
They have very little time to think of the way they can live. Yet sometimes,
when one is caught in some tense situations, like a massive traffic jam or
getting up at two in the morning to collect water from the municipal system one
thinks, is this town the best place to live?
Recently, two national weeklies, "India Today" and
"Outlook - Money" carried articles giving the findings of the studies
they carried out to arrive at the rankings of the places to live in.
The article in India Today was on "Which are the Best and the Worst states of
India" on the basis of quality of life and work. The article in the other
weekly was on "Which are the Best cities to live in." For the readers
of the Real state Reporters the studies are of immense value in making
decisions about the places to live in, work or to invest. Earlier too there
have been studies, but they were mostly confined to some specific purposes.
Also they were based on hunches, expert views or interviews.
For past few yearsa few foreign firms in real estate leasing like CB Richard Ellis Ltd, Jones
Laing Lasalle have been regularly doing surveys to know about investment
climate and trends in major metropolitan cities, mainly for their clients,
since their post liberalization arrival.
Confederation of Indian Industries got a survey done
recently but that was to find out most favourable climate from the investment
point of view of industries. Rajeev Gandhi Institute of contemporary tudies
too, I am told, carried out a study but that was to find the market condition,
size and potentials. In both the studies, Delhi beats other metros hands down.
But study conducted by OUTLOOK is different. It is to find out which city is
better to live. By whom, may we ask? By all means. Market researchers have a
particular jargon to defme this. They say most research done by them is for See
A & B of the population. They are the people who had good education, enjoy
steady income, their children go to English medium school, they love comforts,
like to spend and dislike hassles. The rich have a place in every town. The
poor have to eke out a living anywhere, any slum, any city where they can find
a place to rest their head.
The parameters for the study and the ranking were
cushy jobs and income opportunities, finance network, prices of commodities of
daily need, consumption levels, good housing, and safety from crime, transport,
entertainment, pollution and weather. Quite a bagful.
The study considered 55 cities. The article goes on to
describe how the data was collected and what weightage was given to each one of
them. These are of interest to market researchers not for us, the see A & B
crowd. Both S M Krishna and Chandrababu N aidugaru may explode in rage as
neither Bangalore nor Hyderabad could get to the top. The pride of the place
goes to Chandigarh. The credit, of course, goes to Le Corbusier and his
Colleague Jenre, its designers who laid it out with a great vision of the
future and the spirit of Punjabi who has a Zest for living and wants to live
well. For living well a Punjabi can go to any extent and if required
disciplines himself. That's why they form the bulk of army.
A westerner whichever assignment he is given makes through job
of it. He places a great importance on planning. He collects substantial amount
of data.
The designers of Chandigarh studied climate, topography, natural
wealth of the region, habits and idiosyncrasies of the people who are likely to
inhabit the city and accommodated all of them. First and foremost I must
mention Corbusier took a pledge from the government that there will be no
personal statues in the city. Not stopping at it he also got it engraved in
stone and got it embedded in the city hall. He knew what a great idolaters we
are! One has to go around our Vidhana Soudha to observe how statues are
springing up on the lawns. I have seen also statues of Anna, Gandhi, etc., in
dilapidated conditions in many of the southern towns, definitely eyesores in busy
places.
He has laid out the city in grid pattern with very wide
arterial roads and got them paved fully at the start. He made sectors of
habitation look inwards i.e. no house or building has a front on the arterial
roads. He knew how we encroach roads at the front. Bazaars were tucked into the
heart of the sectors so that the chaos remains deep with in; Created green
strips all along the city and forbade vehicles in them; Placed parks along
natural valleys and fenced to prevent slums springing along them; dammed a
seasonal rivulet to create a lake for recreational purpose. He also undertook a
pledge from the Government that there will be no polluting industries in or
near the town.
He encouraged private initiatives in beautification efforts.
Otherwise how could Mr. Nekchand, a mere class IV employee of PWD create a
world famous Rock Garden to the Lake?
I was fortunate to be arrison Engineer of
Chandhigarh Cantonment, which was still in initial stages of development, and
by Nehru's order we had to ensure that everything planned there was to conform
the Chandigarh planning egulations. This provided me with many opportunities of
interacting with the town's planning team.
One could learn from the vision these masters have. Le
Corbusier was known for his preference to vertical growth of the city. But as
for as Chandigarh is concerned he has spread it far and wide and has given it
low vertical growth, most appropriate for hot and dry climate. The top ten
cities for good living according to survey are Chandhigarh, Chennai, Kolkatta,
Hyderabad, Mumbai, Bangalore, Bhopal, Goa, Pondicherry and Ahmedabad. The six
metros in the study are, Kolkatta, Mumbai, Chennai, Delhi, Bangalore and
Hyderabad. Let us confine to Metros and see how Bangalore fares in this group.
Among the Metros the first place goes to Chennai in the
overall ranking for all the parameters. Bangalore is 5th out of 6. Not
something to boast of for people who dream of it as Singapore of India. This
should not dishearten us but spur us to greater thinking and action. However,
how Bangalore ranks with respect to each parameter should be interest to us.
For jobs and income Bangalore is at the top followed closely
by Chennai and Hyderabad. For banking and finance net work, Kolkatta comes
first followed by Mumbai and Bangalore. The quality lag between successive
rankings is big. While Kolkatta hogs 86.4, Mumbai is 69.7 and Bangalore is
30.8. Anyone who has been to a Bank in Bangalore cannot but agree with the
ranking. The leisurely dejaview attitude of banking staff is a class by itself.
It takes anything between 15 minutes to half an hour to take out cash, twice
that time to deposit. It . takes 6 weeks to get an ATM card after handing over
the application.
This is my experience with a busy branch of a nationalized
South based bank. Again in the prices, which matter to See A & B, which
takes into account fruit and vegetable prices, education, medical fees, wages
for services like maids and . servants Bangalore ranks fifth. The ranks of the
rest of the Metros are Kolkatta, Mumbai, Chennai, Hyderabad and Delhi. I am
sure the researches might not have taken into account the quality of service
and the dependability of the service providers. If we take into consideration
quality of service I might place Mumbai at the top. I have lived in almost all
Metros except Secunderabad.
In consumption, Hyderabad tops the ranking; Bangalore is at
the bottom. It should come as no surprise knowing the life style of Reddy's.
But one wonders how Chennai could be two ranks above Bangalore. May be sober
and prudent Madarasis have taken to conspicuous consumption in the footsteps of
their leader, Amma Jayalalitha after her birthday bashes (or was it adopted
son's marriage?). In housing too Bangalore is last but one, Kolkatta being at
the bottom of the heap. This is no surprise, as the laws are antiquated, the
cost of construction being one of the highest (cement costs nearly 1.3 times
what it costs in Mumbai), t~e registration charges were the highest till a
month ago, and landlords have the habit of providing minimum facility and
expecting maximum rent. No built in furniture, ceiling fan, etc. In Delhi all
these come along with the built space.
Here I must remind, once again, that the survey covers only
Upper middle class. How does the housing statistics for the city as a whole
look? Bangalore is deficient by 71,000 dwelling units. Less than 25% fthe
population has access to household connection of both water and sewerage. About
half the water connections get water once in two or three days. Bangalore has
289 registered slums. According to Karnataka Kolegeri Nivasagala Samyuktha
Sanghatane, 66% of the dwellers do not have access to a toilet. Toilet
complexes built under Nirmal Bangalore are unaffordable. The pipeline made by
civic authorities in the slums is substandard and they are clogged, leaking and
overflowing.
But, we the See A & B can turn a Nelson eye to these
urban festers and walk past them covering our noses. In education too,
Bangalore is 5th• Hyderabad and Chennai take the first and the second place.
May be there is an overabundance of educational set ups in Bangalore, but the
quality is abysmally low. Reader may recall, a decade ago, there used to be
advertisements for vacancies, especially in engineering, with the rider, that Bangalore
University graduates need not apply. In Health facilities,
Bangalore is 3rd and
Chennai stands first. Surprisingly, Bangalore is ranked first in safety and
Delhi the worst. Police commissioners may
note and department may rejoice. In transport Bangalore ranks the last and
Hyderabad occupies the first place.
Thanks to tunnel vision of our city planners and their
ostrich like attitude towards MRT we may still stay in the same place for quite
some time. In pollution Bangalore is 4th and Chennai is the least polluted. In
weather, of course, Bangalore is first. One sincerely would like to believe
that city planners do not take the credit for it. If anything the credit should
go to Almighty and Kempegowda for founding the city.
Another surprising result is
Bangalore's ranking in entertainment. It is at the last place (sixth).
Bangalore some time ago, boasted of highest number of cinema halls in the
country. With so many gayana sabhas, western music concerts, pubs, racecourse
with yearlong betting facility it's ranking should have been higher. The
article also carries interviews with one or two prominent citizens of each-
city. As far as Bangalore is concerned as could be guessed, they have gone over
to Mr. Nandan Nilekani, the Infosys chief and taken his opinion. In his opinion
it is the most livable city in India, has excellent climate, quality of life
and a sense of warmth. It has great sense of community and high degree of
inclusiveness. He also says it can do with better public transportation and town
planning. What else can Head of Bangalore Agenda Task Force can say? He has
said what is expected of him to say. But when I attend the World Environment
Day, World Habitat Day and World Clean Air Day organized by Institution of
Engineers I get a different feeling.
In these celebrations we hear of
the drinking water scarcity, the widening gap between haves and have-nots and
the high levels of Carbon mono oxide, Carbon di-oxide, Sulphur and suspended
particles.Actually the place to live in depends
upon what key factor one is looking for which changes from time to time, age
and from need to need. Even in the case of employment it depends upon the
speciality, hetherit is IT, Finance, Stock market, Real Estate, Construction,
etc. Once one has the decent employment one starts looking for other factors.
The strength of the outlook
survey is that it provides ranking for 55 cities on key factors. Thus it
provides a data base on which a person can narrow down his choice and then make
further enquiry. As the article has said most of us fantasize about the distant
hills, balmy air, raising kids in the lap of nature, away from the hustle
bustle. It may not always be possible, even after retirement. With the absence
of reliable social security and old age care, one may have to live with or near
children unless they are all in USA or in some such distant land.
Which direction Bangalore has to
take if the living and working conditions have improved? It is very difficult
question. There are no packaged answers. But there is a great unanimity among
urban planners that the migration should be drastically reduced. Migration
accounts for half the growth of the city. It is only possible if employment
opportunities of similar standards are created elsewhere in the state. The old
concept of satellite town development near the city has failed miserably. New
Bombay, Yalhanka and Kengeri can be quoted as examples. Ultimately they are
absorbed into urban conglomeration and add to longer vehicular movement. Towns
and cities far from Bangalore should be developed.
Cities which already have some
infrastructure in place need to be taken up as new cities are a costly gamble.
Karnataka fortunately is blessed with many cities which hold promise. Mysore,
Tumkur, harwad, Mangalore are some of cities one can think of. Of them, Mysore
and Dharwad are blessed with mild climate. Accessibility to Bangalore and to
other global destinations, if ensured Mysore could rival Bangalore in becoming
an attracti ve growth centre. Doubling of railway line between the two cities,
its electrification and upgrading the present Bangalore - Mysore highway to 6
lane dual carriage way, improving the water supply of Mysore city are some of
the investment friendly schemes.
We are told that Mr. Aziz Premji,
Chairman WIPRO is so enamoured by Mysore that he would not mind developing its
airstrip. Both the centre and state could think of private participation in all
these projects including Railways.Completion of the Railway line between Mangalore and Hassan,
inclusion of it in the newly created railway zone, pri vatising of power
generation and - distribution in the city, improving the municipal
infrastructure, improving the aerodrome are some of the measures one can think
of. Dharwad has a history of neglect dating back to the old Bombay province
.State reorganization has not brought any noticeable development. The blame
rests with the politicians of the area.
This apart what else to improve
Bangalore? I would go with three simple suggestions put forward by Bittu Sahgal,
well known environmentalist. He suggests government to be facilitator for more
housing, beefing up of water services, health services, education and
transport. Develop the rural interconnectivity with good roads, restore the
health of lakes, detoxify the lakes, and encourage non polluting cottage
industries.
For those who are looking for far
from the maddening crowd retirement around Bangalore, one would recommend
Hosur, specially the township Titan is creating there. Hosur was known as
Little England for its climate, is now well connected by road from Bangalore,
and has good educational facility, healthcare centres have developed in
Electronic City.